🔗 Share this article

In a notable legal reversal, the Australian classification review board has reversed a earlier ruling that prevented viewers in Australia from seeing recorded content of the shooting incident involving conservative commentator Charlie Kirk. This challenge was lodged by Elon Musk's social media platform, which contested an directive issued at the request of the online safety regulator.

Details of the Case and Ban

Following the fatal shooting of Charlie Kirk at a US campus in last year, the eSafety commissioner applied to the review board to assess and rate the available footage. It first determined the content was "refused classification", a designation that allowed the regulator to instruct platforms to restrict access to the videos for users in Australia.

The platform X challenged the decision for two separate videos depicting the Kirk incident. Additionally, it contested a similar ruling on another piece of footage—depicting the assault of Iryna Zarutska on a North Carolina train—which had likewise been classified as "unacceptable for distribution".

Arguments Presented and Final Ruling

Arguing its case, X contended that the footage in question contained only brief violence with no visible weapon. It was argued the footage was grainy and the camera quickly panned away from the individual to the bystanders.

The social media giant argued the video was not excessively detailed, exploitative, or objectionable, stating it served as a neutral objective record of "a notorious public event of historical and political significance that generated widespread discussion". The platform even compared the footage and the well-known recording of the JFK shooting.

Most members of the review board ultimately agreed that, "despite the terrible nature of the event," the video did not reach a level that was gratuitous, exploitative or offensive enough to justify a complete ban. The board suggested that a longer or clearer version with alternative commentary could have resulted in a different ruling. As a result, the panel revised the rating of the content to R18+.

A Dissenting Viewpoint

A minority on the board disagreed, arguing the video was "content designed for sharing for the probable aim of amusement and/or personal gain (such as likes, shares, or views)". This view stated the parallel with the JFK assassination tape was invalid, as the Kennedy video was released long after the event, "once emotions regarding it had calmed".

Reactions to the Outcome

Posting on its global government affairs account, the platform welcomed the ruling.

"We challenged this decision to uphold freedom of expression and the critical nature of public access about matters of public significance. Our commitment remains committed to protecting these fundamental values."

Representatives for the eSafety commissioner also welcomed the ruling, but pointed out that the revised classification now implies platforms "have obligations to ensure R18+ material being displayed to Australians under 18".

Recent Developments on Sensitive Footage

Separately, the eSafety commissioner did not issue take-down orders to social media companies this week regarding disturbing videos from the recent Bondi beach terror attack circulating on social media. The regulator stated that while the content were distressing, they had not met the high threshold for a "refused classification" rating.

Instead, the companies have been advised to use sensitive content labels and screens, such as obscuring the image, on this material in accordance with their own content policies.