🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that indecision on how best to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while working abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want more sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others contend the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, providing a spiritual perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.